Real-Time Comment Analysis

2001 Roadless Rule Revision

The docket in numbers: how the pile of submissions was collected, deduplicated, and cleaned — volume, length, duplication, and the organized campaigns running. Sentiment lives on the analysis home; topics on Topics in Depth.

2026-08-20 – 2026-10-06 · 390,062 comments to date
390,062
Comments collectediEvery public submission pulled from regulations.gov for this docket, before any processing — the raw count.
81,569
Unique commentsiThe distinct things the docket was told. Three kinds of repetition are folded into one comment each: identical copies, template letters with an identical body under personalized openings and signatures, and campaign letters built from the same template but reworded. Every 'unique' figure on every page of this analysis is this number. Repetition is detected on comments of at least 100 characters — shorter ones carry too little text to compare.
308,493
Repeated submissionsiSubmissions that repeat another comment — an identical copy, a template letter, or a reworded campaign letter: collected minus unique.
18
Topics trackediThe number of topic categories the classifier can assign to a comment (a comment can raise several).
386,334
Classified for sentimentiComments read by the model and labeled for their position — supports, opposes, or neutral. Identical duplicates inherit their group's label.

Comment length distribution

How long the comments run — a proxy for substance versus one-line form submissions.

20,179
40,358
60,536
80,715
2505007501k1k1k1k2k2k2k2k3k3k3k3k4k4k4k4k5k5k+
Comment length (characters, upper bound of bin)Bar height = number of comments

About the comments

Repetition is folded away one kind at a time, so each row is what still stands after that kind. The bottom row is the “unique comments” figure used on every page of this analysis. Repetition is detected on comments of at least 100 characters — shorter ones carry too little text to compare meaningfully.

79% repeated
Collectedall submissions
390,062
After identical copiesthe same text submitted more than once
388,667−1,395 folded into 1,395
After template lettersan identical body under personalized openings and signatures
388,659−8 folded into 8
After small familiesthree to nine copies of one letter, caught by shared text
383,168−5,491 folded into 1,571
Unique commentswhat remains
81,569

Organized campaigns

Beyond exact duplicates, comments are grouped into campaigns — sets built from the same template, whether copied word-for-word or lightly reworded. These are the last two rows of the funnel above: 302,426 submissions folded into 819, each counted once in the “unique comments” total. Below is who is running them and how large they are.

819 distinct campaigns

Exact form letters — 16 submissions share a verbatim template block, folded into 8

39,773“you to keep the roadless rule”
31,368“you to keep the roadless rule”
4,955“you to keep the roadless rule”
193“you to keep the roadless rule”
99“you to keep the roadless rule”
98“keep the roadless rule in place”

Reworded templates — 302,410 submissions match a paraphrased version (caught by meaning, not exact words), folded into 811

85,744Keep the Roadless Area Conservation Rule to keep the environment and earth healthy for future generations to explore learn and enjoy!!!<br/><br/>The F…
10,128Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation Public Comment,Last year, more than 625,000 people from across the United States wrote to the USDA, urging t…
1,276Please maintain protections for the 45 million acres of wild and roadless forests and don’t rescind or alter the Roadless Area Conservation Rule…
570am a resident of Duval County in the state of Florida and respectfully urge you to withdraw this proposal and retain the Roadless Rule's national…
296Dear Joshua White, <br/><br/>I am born and raised here in the Tongass. spent my childhood playing, subsisting and enjoying the Tongass National Forest…
244strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule.<br/><br/>Our national forests are public lands, our shared birthright, and they should…

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment's originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.