Climate & Refugia

Roadless areas store carbon, buffer temperature extremes, and provide intact refugia where species can shift in response to a warming climate.

Overview

Forests cool the ground beneath them. Under an intact forest canopy, ground-level temperatures during the hottest part of the day average roughly 4°C cooler than in open areas — and during heatwaves, the difference can exceed 5°C, with peak differences as high as 11°C documented in some studies. The cooling effect comes from canopy shade, transpiration, and the deep, moist soils that intact forests build over centuries. This is not metaphor: forests function as physical air conditioners for the species and ecosystems beneath them, including for streams that stay cold because the forest above them blocks the sun (Schnabel et al. 2025; Wang et al. 2025; Xu et al. 2022).

The cooling matters because the species and ecosystems that depend on it are already under climate pressure. Cold-water fish — bull trout, native cutthroat, salmon — depend on cold headwater streams that are becoming rarer as overall stream temperatures rise. Studies of the western U.S. show that under modest warming scenarios, the cold-water habitat that salmonids need could be reduced to less than 13 percent of current stream networks (Isaak & Young 2023). Species also need to move — northward, upslope, upstream — to track shifting climate conditions. Roadless areas, with intact forest cover, unbroken elevation gradients, and headwater streams that remain cold, function as climate refugia: the places where species can persist while the broader landscape warms. Researchers describe these refugia as one of the largest hopes for population persistence under climate warming (Morelli et al. 2016; Gibson et al. 2026).

The Notice of Intent that proposed rescinding the Roadless Rule cites "growing impacts of extreme wildfire, drought, and insect and disease infestations" as justification for increased road access and active management. The research points the other way. Intact forests buffer microclimate temperatures — the buffering capacity is highest in warm and dry years, precisely when species need it most (Thom et al. 2020). Protected forests warm at rates up to 20 percent slower than the surrounding landscape (Xu et al. 2022). Once forests are fragmented by roads, that buffering capacity declines: clearcuts can take 30 years to recover their pre-harvest cooling effect, and edge effects penetrate 20 meters or more into adjacent forest (Starck et al. 2025; Ewers & Banks-Leite 2013). The roadless condition is not what makes these lands vulnerable to climate stress. It is what makes them resilient to it.

What the research shows

Forest canopies cool the ground beneath them. Under intact forest canopies, daily maximum temperatures average roughly 4°C cooler than in open areas, with peak cooling exceeding 5°C during heatwaves. During an extreme 11-day heatwave in 2003, forest understory was on average 5.2°C cooler than open areas, with peak differences reaching 11°C (Schnabel et al. 2025; Wang et al. 2025).

Cold-water fish habitat is shrinking. Climate warming has reduced cold-water habitat in western U.S. streams, and modest additional warming would shrink it further. Under projected 1–2°C stream temperature increases, the cold-water habitat that bull trout, cutthroat, and salmon depend on would cover less than 13 percent of current network lengths (Isaak & Young 2023; Mejia et al. 2023).

Fragmenting forests reduces their cooling effect. Forest fragmentation impairs the temperature-buffering effect of forest canopies. Edge effects from clearings extend 20 meters or more into the forest, and clearcut stands take roughly 30 years to recover the cooling capacity of unharvested forest (Ewers & Banks-Leite 2013; Starck et al. 2025).

Protected forests warm more slowly than surrounding land. Protected tropical forests are 4.71°C cooler than surrounding croplands, and protected boreal forests warm at rates up to 20 percent slower than surrounding non-protected areas of the same vegetation type. Conservation status itself contributes measurably to climate buffering (Xu et al. 2022).

Roadless areas function as climate refugia. Researchers identifying priorities for climate-change refugia explicitly name "decommission roads," "protect roadless headwaters," and "increase connectivity" among the most important management actions. Intact roadless areas combine the canopy cover, cold headwater streams, and unbroken elevation gradients that species need to adapt to a warming climate (Morelli et al. 2016; Gibson et al. 2026).

Sources

Show all 11 sources

Peer-reviewed research

  1. Schnabel, F., Beugnon, R., Yang, B., et al. (2025). Tree Diversity Increases Forest Temperature Buffering via Enhancing Canopy Density and Structural Diversity. Ecology Letters, 28(3), e70096.
  2. Starck, I., Aalto, J., Hancock, S., et al. (2025). Slow recovery of microclimate temperature buffering capacity after clear-cuts in boreal forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 363, 110434.
  3. Wang, M., Blondeel, H., Gillerot, L., et al. (2025). Influence of forest canopy structure on temperature buffering in young planted forests with varied tree species compositions revealed by terrestrial laser scanning. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 371, 110640.
  4. Isaak, D. J., & Young, M. K. (2023). Cold-water habitats, climate refugia, and their utility for conserving salmonid fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 80(7), 1187–1206.
  5. Mejia, F. H., Ouellet, V., Briggs, M. A., et al. (2023). Closing the gap between science and management of cold-water refuges in rivers and streams. Global Change Biology, 29(19).
  6. Xu, X., Huang, A., Belle, E., De Frenne, P., & Jia, G. (2022). Protected areas provide thermal buffer against climate change. Science Advances, 8(44), eabo0119.
  7. Thom, D., Sommerfeld, A., Sebald, J., et al. (2020). Effects of disturbance patterns and deadwood on the microclimate in European beech forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 291, 108066.
  8. McGuire, J. L., Lawler, J. J., McRae, B. H., Nuñez, T. A., & Theobald, D. M. (2016). Achieving climate connectivity in a fragmented landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(26).
  9. Morelli, T. L., Daly, C., Dobrowski, S. Z., et al. (2016). Managing Climate Change Refugia for Climate Adaptation. PLoS ONE, 11(8), e0159909.
  10. Ewers, R. M., & Banks-Leite, C. (2013). Fragmentation Impairs the Microclimate Buffering Effect of Tropical Forests. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e58093.

Government and technical reports

  1. Gibson, D. J., Kuder, H. E., & Fey, S. B. (2026). What environmental features give rise to thermal refuges? A systematic review. Oikos, 2026(1), e11582.

Want to see how a specific area functions as climate refugia? Choose a roadless area →

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless