Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
Respectfully,
Robyn Harding
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
Stop giving away our natural resources to special interests.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
The Roadless Rule is very important for the state of New Hampshire's economy which depends on tourism as an income source. If the magnificent landscape of NH is harmed by the loss of forests, we will lose those visitors not to mention our quality of life here in the Granite State.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to maintain the Roadless Rule and its protection for approximately 45 million acres of national forests.
Roadless forests provide important wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, preserve connected landscapes, offer valuable opportunities for outdoor recreation, and support local communities and economies. These public lands provide lasting benefits for people and wildlife and should remain protected for future generations.
Responsible forestry should be science-based and appropriate to the landscape. Rescinding the Roadless Rule could open currently protected areas to new roads, potentially fragmenting habitat, affecting water quality, and creating additional demands on already-stretched U.S. Forest Service staff and resources.
Please maintain the Roadless Rule and continue protecting these important national forest lands for future generations.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 674 submissions in its group.