Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

The record in numbers.

Every comment posted to the docket on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, read, grouped, classified and scored. Unique comments count each letter once — copies and campaign letters are grouped, and the group counts as one; submissions are everything posted. Every figure here opens the comments behind it.

81,569unique comments390,062submissions3,584unique comments the agency owes an answer 5,891 submissions

Where they stand

Shares of the classified comments; comments under 30 characters carry no position.

How hard they are to set aside

Answerability rates how hard a substantive comment is for the agency to dismiss. A copy of a campaign letter carries its letter's level.

Comments received each day

Bar height is submissions that day; the darker part is unique comments. Tap or hover a bar for its count. 48 days, Aug 20 – Oct 6.

Aug 20Sep 13Oct 6

Oct 6: 31,364 submissions, 14,180 unique comments

How the submissions group

KindGroupsSubmissions
Unique letterA letter no one else sent.77,78477,784
Exact copyByte-identical to another submission.1,3952,790
Same bodyThe same body as another submission, with a different opening or signature.816
Small familyOne letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded.1,5717,062
CampaignOne letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded.811302,410

The largest campaigns

Each named by how its letter opens: the record does not say which organisation ran it.

  1. “I oppose the Trump administration’s plans to rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The roadless areas…”71,680 submissions · Opposes rescission · Climate Carbon Storage, Recreation Tourism Public Use, Water Quality Quantity, Wildlife Habitat
  2. “I urge you to keep the Roadless Rule in place exactly as it is. Like millions of Americans who have spoken out…”33,601 submissions · Opposes rescission · Climate Carbon Storage, Recreation Tourism Public Use, Water Quality Quantity, Wildlife Habitat
  3. “USDA Department of Agriculture Forest Service,I’m writing to urge you to protect nearly 59 million acres of…”22,871 submissions · Opposes rescission · Environmental Protection Biodiversity, Recreation Tourism Public Use, Water Quality Quantity, Wildlife Habitat
  4. “The Forest Service should keep the Roadless Rule intact exactly as it is. Do not weaken or repeal this…”16,353 submissions · Opposes rescission · Public Opinion Support, Water Quality Quantity, Wildlife Habitat
  5. “Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area…”15,005 submissions · Opposes rescission · Tribal Sovereignty, Water Quality Quantity, Wildlife Habitat
All 811 campaigns →

How long they are

Unique comments by length in characters; the last bar is 5,000 and over.

02,5005,000+

0–250 characters: 24,985 unique comments, 29,278 submissions

The rest of the analysis

  • Reading the Docket → The plain-language account of what the comment data is and what it shows.
  • The substantive analysis → Every substantive comment scored 0–3 on eight dimensions, set against how hard it is to dismiss — and the strongest comments on each side.
  • Topics in Depth → How many raise each topic, where they stand, how substantive they are, and which topics are raised together.
  • Places → The National Forests and roadless areas commenters name, and where they write from.
  • Law & science → The law and science commenters cite, including work the agency’s own record does not contain.
  • Campaigns → The organised letters, largest first: each letter, how many submitted it, the topics it raises, and when it arrived.
  • The full count → Every submission, with attachment bundles counted as the submissions they enclose.
  • Check my comment → Enter a comment’s ID to see how it was classified and scored, with its scored passages shaded.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless