Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Ms. JANE Morawski
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Ms. ROBERT GORDON
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Mr. Christopher Lish
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Save our home
Sincerely,
L. S. Moore
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Lisa Jarman
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
lisa fiedor
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Ms. Diane Haines
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Hardin
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Dziekan
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
BONNIE CABRAL
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Starlene Everson
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Ms. Penny Mathis
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Ms. Michele Halbeisen
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Susan Murphy
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Marie Zirklova
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Ms. karen S
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Cinzia B.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Mr. Peter Wilson
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am writing to urge you to reject the proposed recission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions.
Our National Forests provide homes for wildlife, filter drinking water, protect against wildfires, and reduce climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Keeping these vibrant ecosystems intact is vital for the environment and the communities who enjoy these benefits.
Repealing the Roadless Rule could open these forests to clear-cutting and development at a time when land conservation is more important than ever.
Please reject this proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule and maintain protections for our National Forests.
Sincerely,
Donald Proud
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 301 submissions in its group.