Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Len Ruvinsky
As an long time conservationist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I strongly oppose the Forest Service' s proposal to repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tonga's National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
If a rollback occurs it will have devastating impacts & costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections because it protects our forests, climate, and communities. I strongly urge the DOI - FS to not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
OSCAR SIMPSON
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Thomas Kuspiel
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Arci Jimenez
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Richard Stern
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Kristen CARLSGAARD
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
James Blauth
As a professional wildlife biologist, retired from Federal Service and a concerned conservationist, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule. In particular I know the importance of roadless areas to maintain wildlife habitat for many wildlife species in National Forests in Alaska. Roads can adversely impact wildlife corridors, and open areas to development that displaces wildlife use.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Deborah Rudis
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Jim Gergat
As an environmentalist, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Olympic National Forest in the state of Washington. The Roadless Rule is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Keep our forests, climate, communities and wildlife safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Judith Gott
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Barbara Pray
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Diane LaMagdeleine
As a citizen concerned with protecting the natural environment and as a member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule. The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development. Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country. This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet: - Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink - Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation. - Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis. - Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development. - Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits. We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Nina Spelter
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Mary Gustason
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Teresa McCartney
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Karen Kujala
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Michael Mason
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Wendy Buchanan
As an environmentalist and member of the League of Conservation Voters, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.
The Roadless Rule currently protects more than 44 million acres of land from logging and road construction, including old-growth forests like the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. It is one of the most important safeguards we have to protect our national forests from corporate development.
Rescinding the Roadless Rule would open the door to road-building, logging, and industrial development, jeopardizing our nation’s most treasured old-growth forests and threatening the health and safety of communities across the country.
This rollback is a blatant, reckless giveaway to corporate polluters — with devastating costs for our communities and our planet:
- Wildlife habitat will be shattered, pushing vulnerable species to the brink
- Drinking water will be polluted for millions of Americans, due to increased runoff and contamination from deforestation.
- Old-growth forests will be destroyed, releasing more carbon and worsening the climate crisis.
- Wildfires will be made more destructive, fueled by new roads and reckless development.
- Our last wild places will be lost, sacrificed for corporate profits.
We cannot risk losing these protections. Help keep our forests, climate, and communities safe — do not repeal the Roadless Rule.
Sincerely,
Pamela Vasquez
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 8,291 submissions in its group.