Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Daniel Dole
dandole9@icloud.com
Sincerely,
Daniel Dole
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Steve Betts
bladeline99@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Steve Betts
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Margaret Anderson
carinapup@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Margaret Anderson
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Mia Wyatt
miawyatt@verizon.net
Sincerely,
Mia Wyatt
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Chris Frost
chris.frost.1@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Chris Frost
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Kim Ganz
kaganz@sbcglobal.net
Sincerely,
Kim Ganz
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
John Kochanowski
iron.john.koch1@gmail.com
Sincerely,
John Kochanowski
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Andrew Bidwell
bidtheefarewell@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Andrew Bidwell
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Clem Lottimer
clemgator@comcast.net
Sincerely,
Clem Lottimer
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Duke Ash
boyduke@webtv.net
Sincerely,
Duke Ash
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Grace Deacon
Sincerely,
Grace Deacon
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Traulane Agrusa
traulane7@aol.com
Sincerely,
Traulane Agrusa
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Roe
jenroe2480@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Jennifer Roe
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Judith Cline
wgstprez@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Judith Cline
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Peter Miller
pdmiller@mac.com
Sincerely,
Peter Miller
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Heather Ross
suki@heatherogle.com
Sincerely,
Heather Ross
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Po Hall
buffapo8@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Po Hall
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Donna Wigand
dmwigand@aol.com
Sincerely,
Donna Wigand
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Justin Kreiser
justinkreiser6@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Justin Kreiser
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Shane Nimphius
shanenimphius27@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Shane Nimphius
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,013 submissions in its group.