Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Michael Hoffman
fordmustang73@hotmail.com
Sincerely,
Mr. Michael Hoffman
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Henri Bartholomot
hbartholomot@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Mr. Henri Bartholomot
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Jeanine Garber
topptapper@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Jeanine Garber
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Robert Stitt
rob@robstitt.com
Robert
Sincerely,
Robert Stitt
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Phyllis Olsen
polsen1310@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Phyllis Olsen
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Raquel Narvios
ssalino@sbcglobal.net
Sincerely,
Ms. Raquel Narvios
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Marjorie Geer
gigi2670@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Marjorie Geer
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
BARBARA POWELL
bdpshadow@icloud.com
Sincerely,
Mrs. BARBARA POWELL
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Margo Salone
margosalone@live.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Margo Salone
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Peter Burkard
pmborganic@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Mr. Peter Burkard
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Karen Fortier
klfortier@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Karen Fortier
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Richard Shannahan
rshannahan@verizon.net
Sincerely,
Mr. Richard Shannahan
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Barbara Kawa
barbk22@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Barbara Kawa
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Nancy Ryan
nryan14@sbcglobal.net
Sincerely,
Ms. Nancy Ryan
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests hintact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Toni Meehan
toni25@mac.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Toni Meehan
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Lynne Chimiklis
lchimiklis@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Lynne Chimiklis
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Andrea Dorn
andreadorn@comcast.net
Sincerely,
Mrs. Andrea Dorn
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Jason Calvert
jzcmf3070@aol.com
Sincerely,
Mr. Jason Calvert
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Lionel Mares
lionelm85@outlook.com
Sincerely,
Mr. Lionel Mares
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Suzanne Harris
suzanneharris9802@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Suzanne Harris
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 1,468 submissions in its group.