Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Mary Ann Sell
marsell7724@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Mary Ann Sell
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Wendy Roseland
wendy_roseland@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Ms. Wendy Roseland
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Janice Bang Eckman
bey-48@hotmail.com
Sincerely,
Janice Bang Eckman
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Curran Smits
kathleensmits@sbcglobal.net Smits
Sincerely,
Kathleen Smits
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Elliott Parkin
parkinelliott@gmail.com
Elliott
Sincerely,
Mr. Elliott Parkin
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Ron & Jan Eckstein
roneckstein@charter.net
Sincerely,
Ron & Jan Eckstein
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Diana Kliche
klichediana@gmail.com
Diana
Sincerely,
Ms. Diana Kliche
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Joe Marsala
kcjoe108@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Mr. Joe Marsala Jr
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
As a retired environmental educator, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Karen A. Willey
karenwildfl@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Karen A. Willey
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Vicki Perizzolo
victoria_perizzolo@sbcglobal.net
Sincerely,
Ms. Vicki Perizzolo
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Mary Anne Adelman
thesundancer7@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Mary Anne Adelman
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Katherine Draper
kat_draper@me.com
Sincerely,
Mrs. Katherine Draper
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Kristie Bell
bell_kristie@hotmail.com
Sincerely,
Miss Kristie Bell
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
Hello,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Amanda Stevens
Sincerely,
Dr. Amanda Stevens
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
{Hello}
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Dr. Darrel Kesler
drdjkesler@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Darrel Kesler
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Lee W.Patten (Flintstone Flash)
Sincerely,
Lee W. Patten
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the mop proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Gillean Thom
gillean.thom@att.net
Sincerely,
Mr. Gillean Thom
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
Dear Sen Gallego,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Richard Hildebrand
Sincerely,
Richard Hildebrand
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Mary Cecile Gunelson
mcgunelson@cpps-ofallon.org
Sincerely,
Mary Cecile Gunelson
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation,
I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule.
For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people.
If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost.
Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule.
I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations.
Sincerely,
Kathy Fenton-Miller
kfenton.miller@gmail.com
Sincerely,
Kathy Fenton-Miller
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 178 submissions in its group.