The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments43 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 6middle half 6–6 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
43 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-426312
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 15, 2026FS-2025-0001-407963
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-381702
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-389844
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-394932
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 13, 2026FS-2025-0001-374890
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-343639
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-346796
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-350440
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-352489
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-354372
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-356245
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-357930
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-358898
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-360934
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  16. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-362881
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  17. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-365951
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  18. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-369157
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  19. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-370827
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  20. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 9, 2026FS-2025-0001-339473
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Mr. Schultz, Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact by opting for Alternative 1. I live in a fire prone area along the US-Mexico border, with Coronado National Forest literally bordering our backyard. Our home was spared during the 2011 Monument Fire, however it burned down trees within 15 feet of our house. Fire is a constant and pervasive threat in Southern Arizona, and the canyons here are particularly difficult if not impossible to effectively fight fires in once they’ve begun. As wildfires are more than four times as likely to occur in areas with roads, rescinding this rule could directly endanger my family and our neighbors. The American People overwhelmingly support this rule and our public lands, with nearly 75% of people preferring the roadless rule remain in place. I ask that you please take the popular position of maintaining the roadless rule, and help protect not just our national forests, but the people who live amongst them. Sincerely, Brett Thompson 5179 E Lower Stump Canyon Rd Hereford, AZ 85615 bthompson8@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless