Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
Kind greetings, I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
All the best,
Kara Vance
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a bear enthusiast, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For bear enthusiasts, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define bear culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
Go Bears! Rawwwrrrr!
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner who uses national forest land in Colorado often, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule.
As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place.
For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System.
I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule. As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place. For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System. I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections. Thank you for considering my comment.
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule. As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place. For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System. I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections. Thank you for considering my comment. Sincerely, Alisha Shake
I am writing to urge the U.S. Forest Service to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and select the No Action Alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and proposed rule. As a runner, I value roadless areas because they provide the quiet, undeveloped, backcountry experiences that make running in national forests meaningful. These places offer more than scenery. They protect clean water, intact habitat, connected trail experiences, and the sense of wildness that draws people outdoors in the first place. For runners, roadless areas are training grounds, places of personal renewal, and the setting for many of the events and traditions that define running culture. They also support rural communities that benefit from recreation-based visitation. Opening these landscapes to more road construction and logging would fragment trails, degrade the running experience, and permanently diminish some of the last wild places left in the National Forest System. I support keeping the Roadless Rule in place as a clear safeguard for these lands. Please reject rescission and preserve the existing Roadless Rule protections. Thank you for considering my comment.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 816 submissions in its group.