Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you!
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I strongly support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water, and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
Donna Grossman
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
Kimberly Lewis
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
Sue Carter
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
I support keeping the 2001 Roadless Rule. Roadless forests safeguard wildlife habitats, protect clean water and connect ecosystems.
I am especially concerned about the impact of losing these protections on wildlife in Oregon and Washington, including the northwestern pond turtle, which depends on connected aquatic and upland habitat. I urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to keep turtles on track — not on roads.
Organizations like the Oregon Zoo are working to save wildlife in the Pacific Northwest and rescinding the Roadless Rule would undermine decades of conservation wins.
Please choose Alternative 1, No Action, to retain the 2001 Roadless Rule and its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Thank you for considering my comment.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 286 submissions in its group.