Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its proposal and responding to public comments.
See attached file(sPlease refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.)
See attached file(s)Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 7/24Owed an answerOct 4, 2026FS-2025-0001-543587
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 33 submissions in its group.
The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as
attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact
Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest
Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN
0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first
documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings
and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior
findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its
proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st:
The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as
attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact
Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest
Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN
0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first
documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings
and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior
findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its
proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first
documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings
and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior
findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its
proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first
documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings
and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior
findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its
proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first
documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings
and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior
findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its
proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first
documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings
and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior
findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its
proposal and responding to public comments.
Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)).
Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments. Regarding our first
documents, the Forest Service has failed to disclose and address its own prior factual findings
and judgments regarding the Rule’s importance. These documents are relevant to those prior
findings and judgments and form part of the record the agency should consider in evaluating its
proposal and responding to public comments.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 33 submissions in its group.