The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments43 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 1
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 0
Substance /24
Median 3middle half 3–3 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
43 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-571140
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-571278
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-571376
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-571693
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-573129
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-580176
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-580266
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-580523
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-580616
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-582387
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-582556
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-589069
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-589519
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-589925
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-590737
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  16. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-590997
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  17. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-591161
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  18. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-592063
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  19. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-599532
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  20. Opposes rescissionA1 strongSubstance 3/24Owed an answerOct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-569829
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 43 submissions in its group.

    Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.
    Full analysis of this comment →

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless