The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments3 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 1
  • A0 none 0
Substance /24
Median 4middle half 4–4 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
3 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–3Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA3 weakSubstance 4/24Owed an answerOct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-552714
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 3 submissions in its group.

    The Forest Service is moving to rescind the National Roadless Rule that protects 45 million acres of National Forest lands outside of Idaho and Colorado. The Forest Service’s own analysis shows that eliminating the National Rule will increase human-caused wildfires, degrade habitat for fish and wildlife, and threaten drinking water supplies. This is an outrage!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA3 weakSubstance 4/24Owed an answerOct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-552724
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 3 submissions in its group.

    The Forest Service is moving to rescind the National Roadless Rule that protects 45 million acres of National Forest lands outside of Idaho and Colorado. The Forest Service’s own analysis shows that eliminating the National Rule will increase human-caused wildfires, degrade habitat for fish and wildlife, and threaten drinking water supplies. This is an outrage!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA3 weakSubstance 4/24Owed an answerOct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-554418
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 3 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule!!!! The Forest Service’s own analysis shows that eliminating the National Rule will increase human-caused wildfires, degrade habitat for fish and wildlife, and threaten drinking water supplies.
    Full analysis of this comment →

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless