Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote, and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping in our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 37 submissions in its group.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
I strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I spend time hiking and camping on our national forests, and I value having large areas of public land that remain wild, remote and largely undeveloped. These places provide wildlife habitat, protect watersheds, and give people the chance to experience the backcountry in a way that becomes harder to preserve once roads and development are added.
Please keep the Roadless Rule in place and continue protecting these areas for future generations.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 37 submissions in its group.