The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments4 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 6middle half 6–6 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
4 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–4Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Oct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-602000
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 4 submissions in its group.

    To the U.S. Forest Service: I am writing to express my strong opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. As a raft guide in the area I rely upon the natural benefits of our wild, roadless spaces, particularly two inventoried roadless areas in the Nantahala National Forest: Wesser Bald (4,061 acres) and Cheoah Bald (7,795 acres). I chose the unspoiled wilderness of Western North Carolina for my home. The tourists that visit these wild, roadless spaces (and supply our county with jobs and revenue) travel here because the forests are pristine and the scenery is iconic. Our county's quality of life, property value, and tourism all depend upon the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. Many endangered and protected species live in our forests, streams and rivers: wildlife that relies upon humans to make decisions that ensure the healthy forest ecosystems needed for food, shelter, and breeding. I personally depend on these unfragmented forests and watersheds for clean drinking water. In addition, I paddle the rivers and lakes, and I value the wildlife habitats in our old growth forests, streams and rivers. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to abandon the proposed rescission and instead maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-594612
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 4 submissions in its group.

    To the U.S. Forest Service: I am writing to express my strong opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I rely upon the natural benefits of our wild, roadless spaces, particularly two inventoried roadless areas in the Nantahala National Forest: Wesser Bald (4,061 acres) and Cheoah Bald (7,795 acres). I chose the unspoiled wilderness of Western North Carolina for my home. The tourists that visit these wild, roadless spaces (and supply our county with jobs and revenue) travel here because the forests are pristine and the scenery is iconic. Our county's quality of life, property value, and tourism all depend upon the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. Many endangered and protected species live in our forests, streams and rivers: wildlife that relies upon humans to make decisions that ensure the healthy forest ecosystems needed for food, shelter, and breeding. I personally depend on these unfragmented forests and watersheds for clean drinking water. In addition, I paddle the rivers and lakes, and I value the wildlife habitats in our old growth forests, streams and rivers. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to abandon the proposed rescission and instead maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-595948
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 4 submissions in its group.

    To the U.S. Forest Service: I am writing to express my strong opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I rely upon the natural benefits of our wild, roadless spaces, particularly two inventoried roadless areas in the Nantahala National Forest: Wesser Bald (4,061 acres) and Cheoah Bald (7,795 acres). I chose the unspoiled wilderness of Western North Carolina for my home. The tourists that visit these wild, roadless spaces (and supply our county with jobs and revenue) travel here because the forests are pristine and the scenery is iconic. Our county's quality of life, property value, and tourism all depend upon the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. Many endangered and protected species live in our forests, streams and rivers: wildlife that relies upon humans to make decisions that ensure the healthy forest ecosystems needed for food, shelter, and breeding. I personally depend on these unfragmented forests and watersheds for clean drinking water. In addition, I paddle the rivers and lakes, and I value the wildlife habitats in our old growth forests, streams and rivers. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to abandon the proposed rescission and instead maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Oct 4, 2026FS-2025-0001-547810
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 4 submissions in its group.

    To the U.S. Forest Service: I am writing to express my strong opposition to any efforts to rescind, weaken, or roll back the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I rely upon the natural benefits of our wild, roadless spaces, particularly two inventoried roadless areas in the Nantahala National Forest: Wesser Bald (4,061 acres) and Cheoah Bald (7,795 acres). I chose the unspoiled wilderness of Western North Carolina for my home. The tourists that visit these wild, roadless spaces (and supply our county with jobs and revenue) travel here because the forests are pristine and the scenery is iconic. Many endangered and protected species live in our forests, streams and rivers: wildlife that relies upon humans to make decisions that ensure the healthy forest ecosystems needed for food, shelter, and breeding. Our county's quality of life, property value, and tourism all depend upon the integrity and protection of our inventoried roadless areas. I personally depend on these unfragmented forests and watersheds for clean drinking water. In addition, I paddle the rivers and lakes, and I value the wildlife habitats in our old growth forests, streams and rivers. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to abandon the proposed rescission and instead maintain full protections for all currently designated inventoried roadless areas. Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment. Sincerely, Laura Heinsman
    Full analysis of this comment →

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless