Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 36 submissions in its group.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because of the wildlife that lives there and keeping their natural habitats and environments clean.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is essential to life of all kinds, including humans! I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
Go here: https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FS-2025-0001-223869
Paste this:
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because I care about animals, fungi, microbes, and plants. And without good fresh water ecosystems all of those living things could die off.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because we need fresh water to drink. I live near Lake Michigan and it is a life line to all Wisconsin people. The animals and wildlife need fresh water.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because I think of all the rivers in this country that are already unswimable and undrinkable. I love the Colorado River I have lived along it most my life and just to see the way it's being effect is devastating and concerning for the future.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because I constantly visit parks and national parks and everyone I see that are there enjoy it for the natural bodies of water.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because we need it to survive.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is the habitat to fish and ecosystems that are important to the land.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because water is life. The trees can be sold, the land can be destroyed for profit, and it only hurts our connection to God.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because I love kayaking and fishing with friend.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because nature is important and we need more of it. Not less. We’re greedy and selfish, let the animals have homes, let us have fresh oxygen.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because I love the streams I visit, fishing, wildlife, and I care for my community’s water supply.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it provides us with fresh drinking water, supports ecosystems, brings joy from fishing and swimming, and much more.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because [add your own reason for example, a stream you visit, fishing, wildlife, or your community’s water supply].
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is integral part of our planet and communities and provides for not just human but for animals.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because my local community's water supply relies heavily on aquafers and ground water. No longer having protected pieces of wilderness that are untouched by infrastructure and toxic construction run off could jeopardize that water supply.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because [add your own reason for example, a stream you visit, fishing, wildlife, or your community’s water supply].
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because [add your own reason for example, a stream you visit, fishing, wildlife, or your community’s water supply].
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because [add your own reason for example, a stream you visit, fishing, wildlife, or your community’s water supply].
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 36 submissions in its group.