Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 50 submissions in its group.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is essential to all living species on the planet
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because I like camping in remote areas without well water/potable water. Contamination of our water supply with chemicals and heavy metals would be detrimental to my health.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because all of our park denizens rely on it to live. As humans, we have a special privilege to not only take pleasure in the glories of the environment, but also to steward our natural habitat for the good of all creatures.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because of our valued rivers, swimming holes, our ecosystem. The wildlife. Our access to clean water.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it benefits everyone! Not just us people, but wildlife and of course all the lovely greenery that is so important in this day and age. I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is a basic requirement of all life on this planet.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
Jamie Jones
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because of the few wildlife left in this country, bringing this rule can greatly put said wildlife at risk.I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because that is where all of the outdoor activities happen. Swimming, kayaking, fishing, and any other activities that others do in the waters. Freshwater is home to many fishes for those that want to fish. Freshwater provides giving others a chance to be outside, in the sun, swimming and skipping rocks. Freshwater gives everyone a chance to experience being outside.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters as our protected environments are actively disintegrating because of large corporations lobbing to keep restrictions at bay so they can make more of a profit. With the regular destruction of our natural land for data centers and the poisoning of water for those local communities we need to do what we can to protect our few national parks we have left.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because we deserve untouched public land and water.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because I am a living, breathing, thinking and feeling human being. Human beings literally need freshwater to survive, we literally need forests to exist to be able to continue existing.
Removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because the wildlife that live in and rely on lakes, rivers, and creeks have the right to unpolluted water.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is irreplaceable and fragile. The very foundation of our existence as a species clean fresh water.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because without it, the world would suffer; wildlife and society alike.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because of the wildlife, beautiful hiking, and natural ecosystems which are delicate and important to preserve.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is the basis for a healthy environment, healthy wildlife, and a healthy community. It is an extremely valuable and dwindling resource, and it is very important that we prioritize protecting all remaining sources of fresh water.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because [add your own reason for example, a stream you visit, fishing, wildlife, or your community’s water supply].
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
The quality of rivers, lakes, and streams directly impacts how safe a shoreline is for swimming and fishing, how the terrain surrounding them nourishes vegetation and other critical species, and whether local water supplies are safe to drink from.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the habitats for species I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because I use it for fishing and when camping. We use the fresh waters to help cook food when we camp. We even use it for kayaking and with getting rid of safe fresh water you put all thos activities in danger.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because wildlife and people deserve and need freshwater to survive. USA is known globally for amazing natural areas, freshwater, and amazing wildlife. I am concerned rescinding this rule would only be for the benefit for the few but devastating for the many.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 50 submissions in its group.