Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 3 submissions in its group.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is a vital source of life that I care about protecting. Not only because I visit nature often, I love fishing and protecting wildlife, and I also care about the community’s water supply. But I also care about the memories that water holds. I care about the life it gives to others, not only people but the plants and animals we need to survive.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is important to prioritize nature for the well being of our planet and society as a whole.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you.
I oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Please retain its protections for inventoried roadless areas.
Freshwater matters to me because it is essential for thriving wildlife, green spaces, and for humanity to survive.
I am concerned that removing restrictions on road construction and timber harvesting could increase erosion and sediment entering streams, harming water quality and the aquatic habitat for fish I care about. Please fully evaluate these effects on watersheds and downstream communities.
I urge the Forest Service to retain the Roadless Rule and prioritize clean water in its decision.
Thank you,
Yuri
Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 3 submissions in its group.
Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 3 submissions in its group.
Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 3 submissions in its group.