Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
2 unique comments2 submissions
Position
Supports rescission 100.0%
Answerability
A1 strong 0
A2 moderate 0
A3 weak 0
A0 none 2
Substance /24
Median 5middle half 5–5 · 2 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
2 unique comments naming Sawtooth National Forest signed from UT· showing 1–2Clear all filters
Subject: Public Comment on Proposed Rule: Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation (RIN 0596-AD66)
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to submit a formal public comment in strong support of the proposed rule to rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (RIN 0596-AD66).
As a private property inholder located directly west of George Peak in the Raft River Mountains (Sawtooth National Forest, Minidoka Ranger District), my family is directly impacted by the rigid restrictions of the 2001 national mandate. The Raft River range features a highly complex checkerboard of private inholdings and public land. While federal law guarantees inholders "adequate access" to their properties, the 2001 Roadless Rule introduces an extraordinary and punitive layer of federal bureaucracy for basic, low-impact private land use.
Specifically, we are planning to construct an off-grid cabin on our private land. While we utilize existing classified system roads (FR-004 and FR-009) for transit, the surrounding Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA) restriction severely complicates the logistics of moving structural materials and essential equipment across the final boundary to our property line. Under the current rule, even temporary, zero-impact access or staging requires exhaustive, multi-year NEPA reviews that strain both landowner finances and local Forest Service resources.
Furthermore, the blanket 2001 rule severely restricts the flexibility of local forest managers to quickly approve necessary wildfire mitigation and hazardous fuel reduction efforts along our shared private-public boundaries.
I strongly recommend that the USDA finalize this proposed rule to rescind the national 2001 Roadless Rule. Removing this blanket restriction will return land management authority to local Forest Service officials who possess a nuanced understanding of the Raft River division's unique topography and private property boundaries. Local managers are entirely capable of protecting the environment through standard Land and Resource Management Plans without maintaining a restrictive, nationwide barrier that infringes on the practical exercise of private property rights.
Thank you for your time and consideration of these pertinent issues.
Sincerely,
Daniel Patrick Gorney, A Utah Inholding Landowner
Manager, Oquirrh Endevours LLC, a Utah Corporation
Tremonton, UT 84337
Subject: Public Comment on Proposed Rule: Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation (RIN 0596-AD66)
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to submit a formal public comment in strong support of the proposed rule to rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (RIN 0596-AD66). As a private property inholder located directly west of George Peak in the Raft River Mountains (Sawtooth National Forest, Minidoka Ranger District), our family experiences firsthand the severe, on-the-ground consequences of the current "one-size-fits-all" national mandate.
The Department’s rational statement correctly notes that the 2001 Roadless Rule has "contributed to the lack of active management of the national forests, which in turn has contributed to challenges in addressing forest health concerns." Our private property is a stark, urgent example of this reality. Currently, the vast majority of the timber on our inholding is dead or dying due to severe insect infestations and disease outbreaks. Because our property is entirely surrounded by an Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA), the strict prohibitions on timber cutting, road reconstruction, and heavy equipment access have made it virtually impossible to actively manage or mitigate this ecological crisis.
We cannot safely clear the dead and infested timber, nor can we establish critical fire breaks to protect our upcoming off-grid cabin build and the surrounding public lands. The 2001 rule’s insistence that exceptions be "infrequent" and clear a gauntlet of inconsistent administrative reviews has effectively tied the hands of both landowners and local rangers while the forest health rapidly deteriorates. The dead fuel load on our property and the adjacent federal land poses a catastrophic wildfire risk to the entire George Peak area.
As stated in the proposal, conditions in the Western United States have changed substantially since 2001, marked by "increasing drought, extreme temperatures, wildfire frequency and severity, and insect and disease outbreaks." A blanket national prohibition is no longer a viable conservation strategy; it has become an administrative barrier to ecological survival.
We strongly agree with the Department’s position that returning primary authority to the local level via the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) framework is the correct path forward. Local decisionmakers at the Minidoka Ranger District thoroughly understand the unique "checkerboard" private-public boundaries and specific environmental crises of the Raft River division. Giving local officials the place-based discretion and flexibility to approve collaborative, active management tools will allow us to address our forest health concerns safely and efficiently.
For these reasons, we urge the USDA to finalize the rescission of the 2001 Roadless Rule to restore responsible, localized balance to our public and private forest lands.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Jane Gorney, Inholder
Tremonton, UT 84337