The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

581 unique comments637 submissions
Position
  • Neutral / unclear 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 10
  • A2 moderate 3
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 94
Substance /24
Median 1middle half 1–3 · 107 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
637 submissions · showing 1–20Clear all filters
  1. Neutral / unclearA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-600022
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    To whom it may concern, RE: Docket FS-2025-0001-223869 Please accept my formal comment attached as FS-2025-0001-223869_RLC-20261006-ZB925L.pdf
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-600080
    To whom it may concern, RE: Docket FS-2025-0001-223869 Please accept my formal comment attached as FS-2025-0001-223869_RLC-20261006-POQC3K.pdf Please also note that the sources cited in support of this comment are available from their publishers. Thank you.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-600085
    See attached file(s) roadless2026.pdf Also posted at www.forestclimate.org
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-600155
    Oregon Wild Coalition Comment Submission 2 of 3: supporting literature/reports
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-600258
    Taxpayers for Common Sense submits the following comments and supporting evidence to the Forest Service on the "Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation" proposed rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-600557
    See attached comment letter from the Quapaw Nation.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-600734
    To whom it may concern, RE: Docket FS-2025-0001-223869 Please accept my formal comment attached as FS-2025-0001-223869_RLC-20261006-J2E3WP.pdf The following sources are cited in support of this comment and are available from their publishers: Public Lands and Cultural Resource Protection: A Case Study of Unauthorized Damage to Archaeological Sites on the Tonto National Forest, Arizona Hedquist, S. L., Ellison, L. A., and Laurenzi, A., 2014 The ecological implications of visitor transportation in parks and protected areas: Examples from research in US National Parks Monz, C., D'Antonio, A., Lawson, S., Barber, J. and Newman, P., 2016 Thank you, Callie Moore Hayesville, NC
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601155
    Enclosed are comments presented on behalf of the Cleveland National Forest Foundation.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601192
    My Comment is attached as a word document file. Please also see attached six PDF files that are references to the articles I referenced.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601285
    To whom it may concern, RE: Docket FS-2025-0001-223869 Please accept my formal comment attached as FS-2025-0001-223869_RLC-20261006-B8PBPG.pdf Thank you, Juliet Malik
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601511
    Hello I have written a little statement, see the attached file.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601591
    Please find attached the comments of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Department of Natural Resources on the proposed rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule and the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601805
    Please see my comments in the attachment.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601812
    I am attaching my comments and those of two local high school students who attend Craig County High School. The comments were addressed to Beth Christensen District Ranger, George Washington Jefferson National Forest, Eastern Divide District. I was told to submit the comments to the Forest Service through this website/
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601836
    The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments regarding the proposed USFS Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  16. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-602016
    Thank you for adding the attached study to the project record.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  17. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-602599
    The North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians provides its comment signed by the Chairperson of the tribe.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  18. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-602720
    See attached file(s); please replace earlier comment submission, which was lacking the enclosure documents - now included.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  19. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-602832
    Comments submitted on behalf of the State of Nevada.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  20. Neutral / unclearOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-603043
    Please find the attached comments with 636 individual signers, thank you
    Full analysis of this comment →

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless