The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments114 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 0
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
1 unique comment signed from OK · showing 1–1Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionOct 4, 2026FS-2025-0001-543829
    Once wild forests are gone, they cannot be replaced. And there is no telling what kind of amazing pharmaceuticals could be found in these places. There is no telling what new or lost species might be found in these untrammeled places. Please maintain protections for the 45 million acres of wild and roadless forests and don’t rescind or alter the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. More roads ALWAYS mean more fires. ALWAYS. These forests are full of mature and old-growth trees that provide important wildlife habitat. They’re our favorite places to hike, fish and camp. Wild forests should remain protected from road-building, commercial logging and mining. Industrial activity would destroy the trees and trails we love. Keep our national forests wild. Sincerely, Mercedes Lackey 16525 E 470 Rd Claremore, OK 74017-4445 helloelsie@gmail.com
    Full analysis of this comment →

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless