Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.
6,925 unique comments8,588 submissions
Position
Opposes rescission 90.7%
Neutral / unclear 6.8%
Supports rescission 2.5%
Answerability
A1 strong 9
A2 moderate 1
A3 weak 0
A0 none 562
Substance /24
Median 1middle half 0–2 · 572 scored
Raised alongside it
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
6,925 unique comments on Sentiment Only· showing 1–20Clear all filters
I completely and totally oppose making ANY changes to our current roadless provisions as it pertains to Federal and State land. To be more clear, don't change anything.
As a United Dtates citizen and voter I urge you not to end the Roadless Rule of 2001. We are indeed America the beautiful due to laws such as the Roadless Rule. I’ll be watching and vote accordingly.
National Audubon Society submits the attached technical comments on the proposed rulemaking, draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), and economic analysis concerning management of roadless areas. On behalf of our 2.6 million members and supporters, Audubon urges the U.S. Forest Service not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule.
Say no to the roadless rule. Stop selling off America. I am a republican and will not continue to vote for the party if you waste away our great and beautiful country like this.
Good evening, my name is Julia Barton and I work for the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. I am submitting comments on behalf of our advocates in support of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this important public process.
Please see attached letter from an Oregon hunter and angler who opposes rescission of the Roadless Rule and requests additional analysis and information.
To whom it may concern,
RE: Docket FS-2025-0001-223869
Please accept my formal comment attached as FS-2025-0001-223869_RLC-20261006-POQC3K.pdf
Please also note that the sources cited in support of this comment are available from their publishers.
Thank you.