The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments4 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 7middle half 7–7 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
4 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–4Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 3/24Oct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-604476
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 4 submissions in its group.

    I am writing to strongly oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation. As a frequent hiker, cyclist, camper, these undeveloped lands are directly tied to my lifestyle and community. I frequently recreate in the San Juan national forest, and I rely on these areas for clean drinking water, solitude, and intact fish and wildlife habitat. Rescinding these federal protections undermines decades of durable conservation. The proposal to allow commercial logging and road construction ignoring the existing multi-billion-dollar road maintenance backlog is fiscally irresponsible. Additionally, expanding motorized networks into these zones creates a proven vector for human-caused wildfire ignitions, rather than mitigating fire risks. The current 2001 framework successfully balances forest health with ecosystem preservation. I urge the Forest Service to keep the national Roadless Rule fully intact.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-416777
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 4 submissions in its group.

    I am writing to strongly oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation As a frequent hiker, hunter, canoeist and camper, these undeveloped lands are directly tied to my lifestyle and community. I frequently recreate in the Superior National Forest; since I was a child I considered the National Forest "home". My family ties to the national forest run deep; my grandfather was the head ranger of Superior National Forest in the early 1950s. He was instrumental in creating the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness; the Roadless Area Conservation Act is important for retaining the character of the land adjacent to the BWCAW. Rescinding these federal protections undermines decades of durable conservation. The proposal to allow commercial logging and road construction while ignoring the existing multi-billion-dollar road maintenance backlog is fiscally irresponsible. Additionally, expanding motorized networks into these zones creates a proven vector for human-caused wildfire ignitions, rather than mitigating fire risks. The current 2001 framework successfully balances forest health with ecosystem preservation. I urge the Forest Service to keep the national Roadless Rule fully intact.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 3/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-427398
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 4 submissions in its group.

    I am writing to strongly oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation. As a frequent hiker, camper, and general nature enthusiast, these undeveloped lands are directly tied to my lifestyle and community. Rescinding these federal protections undermines decades of durable conservation. The proposal to allow commercial logging and road construction ignoring the existing multi-billion-dollar road maintenance backlog is fiscally irresponsible. Additionally, expanding motorized networks into these zones creates a proven vector for human-caused wildfire ignitions, rather than mitigating fire risks. The current 2001 framework successfully balances forest health with ecosystem preservation. I urge the Forest Service to keep the national Roadless Rule fully intact.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 7/24Sep 13, 2026FS-2025-0001-372483
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Small family — One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 4 submissions in its group.

    I am writing to strongly oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation As a frequent hiker, cyclist, camper, these undeveloped lands are directly tied to my lifestyle and community. I frequently recreate in the San Juan national forest, and I rely on these areas for clean drinking water, solitude, and intact fish and wildlife habitat. Rescinding these federal protections undermines decades of durable conservation. The proposal to allow commercial logging and road construction ignoring the existing multi-billion-dollar road maintenance backlog is fiscally irresponsible. Additionally, expanding motorized networks into these zones creates a proven vector for human-caused wildfire ignitions, rather than mitigating fire risks. The current 2001 framework successfully balances forest health with ecosystem preservation. I urge the Forest Service to keep the national Roadless Rule fully intact.
    Full analysis of this comment →

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless