Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I am writing to strongly oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the 2001 Roadless Area…”

Small family: One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 3/24

4 submissions
4 versions of the text
4 added words of their own

TopicsEconomic Impact Fiscal Recreation Tourism Public Use Water Quality Quantity Wildlife Habitat

The letter's full analysis →Every submission of it →

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Sep 12Sep 16Oct 6

Sep 12: 1 submissions, 1 unique comments

What it names

National Forests: + San Juan National Forest+ Superior National Forest

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-427398, the comment that stands for the group.

I am writing to strongly oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation. As a frequent hiker, camper, and general nature enthusiast, these undeveloped lands are directly tied to my lifestyle and community. Rescinding these federal protections undermines decades of durable conservation. The proposal to allow commercial logging and road construction ignoring the existing multi-billion-dollar road maintenance backlog is fiscally irresponsible. Additionally, expanding motorized networks into these zones creates a proven vector for human-caused wildfire ignitions, rather than mitigating fire risks. The current 2001 framework successfully balances forest health with ecosystem preservation. I urge the Forest Service to keep the national Roadless Rule fully intact.

← All campaigns