The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments15 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 2middle half 2–2 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
15 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–15Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-593728
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a hiker and backpacker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 24, 2026FS-2025-0001-479482
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a recreation professional who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-380002
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    Hi, I am a hiker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule!!!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-345262
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am an avid hiker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-353231
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a hiker and naturalist who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-359926
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a lifelong hiker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 9, 2026FS-2025-0001-340869
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a hiker and backpacker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-299699
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a outdoor enthusiast who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule!!!!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Aug 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-279085
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a hiker who cares deeply about our national forests. I strongly support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Aug 22, 2026FS-2025-0001-248110
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a citizen and a hiker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 3/24Aug 22, 2026FS-2025-0001-251962
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a Washington resident who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-234339
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a hiker who cares deeply about our national forests and the future of our ecosystem. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-241588
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a hiker from Seattle who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-242435
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a hunter and hiker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-243640
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 15 submissions in its group.

    I am a trail runner who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless