The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments21 submissions

Position

Opposes rescission 100.0%

Answerability

A1 strong 0
A2 moderate 0
A3 weak 0
A0 none 1

Substance /24

Median 2middle half 2–2 · 1 scored

Topics raised

21 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-579404
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Elsa OLIVEIRA DA SILVA Sincerely, Ms. Elsa OLIVEIRA DA SILVA
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Oct 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-527028
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, William John Bartz Jr Sincerely, Mr. William John Bartz Jr
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 30, 2026FS-2025-0001-522566
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Channing-Makana Ham-Young Sincerely, Ms. Channing-Makana Ham-Young
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 30, 2026FS-2025-0001-523115
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, JOHN pi bkbo k IMBRENDA Sincerely, Mr. JOHN pi bkbo k IMBRENDA
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-487146
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Madeline Von der linden Sincerely, Ms. Madeline Von der linden
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-502143
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Mary Schimscheiner MaryAnn Schimscheiner Sincerely, Ms. Mary Schimscheiner MaryAnn Schimscheiner
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-503520
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.We need to save and protect them NOW!!Sincerely, Richard Reed Sincerely, Mr. Richard Reed
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-503774
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Elizabeth Spear- Spear-Wolhart Sincerely, Ms. Elizabeth Spear- Spear-Wolhart
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 24, 2026FS-2025-0001-481431
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, JOE ANN BW TARVER Sincerely, Ms. JOE ANN BW TARVER
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 22, 2026FS-2025-0001-466420
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Thomas Lee Robison Thomas Lee Robison Sincerely, Mr. Thomas Lee
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-449464
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Judi-Ann Smith-Kauhane Sincerely, Ms. Judi-Ann Smith-Kauhane
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-455674
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Alan Rosen Furniture LTD Sincerely, Mr. Alan Rosen Furniture LTD
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 18, 2026FS-2025-0001-445163
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Private Vegan Private Bird Sincerely, Ms. Private Vegan Private Bird
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 18, 2026FS-2025-0001-445643
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Jason James Bogden PhD Sincerely, Mr. Jason James Bogden PhD
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 17, 2026FS-2025-0001-444433
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Keep the Roadless Rule in place! We must respect and protect the Elk!Sincerely, Lisa Rainsong Sincerely, Ms. Lisa Rainsong
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-342878
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Olga Lisette Rodriguez-Munoz Sincerely, Ms. Olga Lisette Rodriguez-Munoz
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-349995
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Why only 2,000 signatures requested? Should be at least 20,000.Sincerely, Tina Rogers Sincerely, Ms. Tina Rogers
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-358843
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Yasmine Annette Escobedo Yasmine Annette Escobedo Sincerely, Ms. Yasmine Annette
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-366364
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Please protect our wildlife.Sincerely, JEANETTE BROWN Sincerely, Ms. JEANETTE BROWN
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-367599
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 21 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Please protect our forest& wildlife!Sincerely, Arlene Burton Sincerely, Ms. Arlene Burton
Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:

Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.