The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments27 submissions

Position

Opposes rescission 100.0%

Answerability

A1 strong 0
A2 moderate 0
A3 weak 0
A0 none 1

Substance /24

Median 2middle half 2–2 · 1 scored

Topics raised

27 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Oct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-605976
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy. Sincerely, Dominick Ngaopraseutsack
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-590220
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy. Thanks, William Seeley
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Oct 4, 2026FS-2025-0001-534028
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, Маша Паракина Sincerely, Ms. Маша Паракина
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Oct 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-525626
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, M C Sincerely, Ms. M C
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Oct 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-526164
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, j s Sincerely, Ms. j s
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 29, 2026FS-2025-0001-508587
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, M D Sincerely, Ms. M D
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-487164
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, D C Sincerely, Ms. D C
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-494576
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, L B Sincerely, Ms. L B
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-503644
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, N M Sincerely, Ms. N M
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 24, 2026FS-2025-0001-477502
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, K R Sincerely, Ms. K R
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 23, 2026FS-2025-0001-471577
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, B K Sincerely, Mr. B K
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 23, 2026FS-2025-0001-472680
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, B M Sincerely, Ms. B M
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-450752
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, L W Sincerely, Ms. L W
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-451054
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, M S Sincerely, Ms. M S
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-451864
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, J P Sincerely, Ms. J P
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-452132
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, F H Sincerely, Ms. F H
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-452413
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, A F Sincerely, Ms. A F
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-454149
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, M B Sincerely, Ms. M B
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 18, 2026FS-2025-0001-445989
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, A W Sincerely, Ms. A W
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24Sep 18, 2026FS-2025-0001-446134
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 27 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I'm writing asking you not to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this important policy has safeguarded 58 million acres of irreplaceable habitat for wildlife like elk and cold-water fish species, guaranteed fresh water to tens-of-millions of Americans, and protected Indigenous areas that provide subsistence hunting and gathering of food.The richness of our nation's ecosystems are a critical part of our national heritage and the Forest Service has a responsibility to ensure that future generations will enjoy the iconic species of our nation's forests and grasslands. Nearly 450 threatened and endangered species depend on roadless areas for their survival. In addition, our national forest system provides drinking water to nearly 90% of the people served by public water systems in the West and provides the water to farmers in California and Arizona who grow 90% of the winter vegetables consumed in the United States. Roads increase sediment and runoff that destroy watersheds. The Roadless Rule also supports areas that are important for Indigenous ceremonies and food gathering. Tribal treaty rights must be centered and upheld in any revision of the 2001 Roadless Rule. In short, there is simply no reason for a repeal of this important conservation policy.Sincerely, S W Sincerely, Ms. S W
Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:

Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.