The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments31 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 0
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
31 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601501

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-602479

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-605625

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionOct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-612189

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-574124

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-583163

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-591147

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-596880

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionOct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-598940

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionOct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-560316

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionOct 4, 2026FS-2025-0001-532330

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionOct 4, 2026FS-2025-0001-535783

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do NOT rescind the roadless rule
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Opposes rescissionSep 30, 2026FS-2025-0001-520090

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Opposes rescissionSep 23, 2026FS-2025-0001-471563

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please DO NOT rescind the roadless rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Opposes rescissionSep 18, 2026FS-2025-0001-446979

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  16. Opposes rescissionSep 17, 2026FS-2025-0001-440407

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do NOT rescind the Roadless Rule!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  17. Opposes rescissionSep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-416373

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  18. Opposes rescissionSep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-383673

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do NOT rescind the Roadless Rule!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  19. Opposes rescissionSep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-345736

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  20. Opposes rescissionSep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-355007

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 31 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the roadless rule!
    Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless