The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments12 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 5middle half 5–5 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
12 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–12Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 24, 2026FS-2025-0001-265017
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    Here is my testimony (feel free to make it your own): " As a long-time hunter, outdoorsman and nature- based educator, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place."
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-225988
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As a long-time nature hiker and paddler, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule will result in irreversible loss of precious conserved lands and would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction, resulting in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place. Thank you, Ann Oeasa
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-226122
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    Here is my testimony (feel free to make it your own): " As a long-time hunter, outdoorsman and nature- based educator, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place."
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-226305
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As a life long lover of the outdoors, former outdoor/nature educator, and parent to children who gather in natural spaces to enjoy their free-time with friends and classmates, I cannot emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE mistake and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place, for the future of conservation, American beauty, and communities of both plant/animal/and human life.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-227763
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As a hunter, forager and nature-lover, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place."
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-227995
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As a long-time outdoorsman and nature- based educator, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place."
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-228037
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As a life-long outdoorsman and nature- based educator, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place."
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-228355
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As a long-time hunter, outdoorswoman,maine master naturalist, and nature- based educator, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place."
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-228591
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As a long-time hiker, canoeist, outdoorswoman and nature- based educator, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place."
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-231481
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As a long-time outdoorsman and nature- based educator, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and with comprehensive understanding of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and to the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species, and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. This rule is vital to the survival of many species, quite possibly including our own. Science has documented that the lives of the earths species are interlinked and interdependent. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-241026
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.

    As an outdoorsman I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal Land Management and conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animals that benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 20, 2026FS-2025-0001-225754
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 12 submissions in its group.

    As a long-time hunter, outdoorsman, and natural based educator, I can't emphasize enough the value of the Roadless Rule in the bigger picture of Federal And Management and. conservation in the United States. This rule was carefully crafted for a wide range of interests and understandings of the value of relatively undisturbed wildlife habitat. Rescinding this rule would be a HUGE step in the wrong direction and would result in major setbacks to community-based processes and the real lives of both common and uncommon habitats, ecological communities, species and individual animalsnthat benefir greatly from the Roadless Rule. I strongly urge you to leave this rule in place.
    Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless