The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments35 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 4middle half 4–4 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
35 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 17, 2026FS-2025-0001-441091
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    Stop the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of people. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I am asking USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-347506
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans. Sincerely,
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-322593
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I voted FOR the Roadless Act, and I am deeply proud of Oregon's Private Forest Accord (PFA), which was passed in 2024. It was an amazing accomplishment involving many organizations. Please do not reverse these accomplishments. I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans. Sincerely, Patricia Armstrong Yachats, Oregon
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-331588
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. We need to preserve these areas for the good of wildlife and future generations of Americans. This is a nonpartisan issue. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-332820
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    Objection to the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 3, 2026FS-2025-0001-308726
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. This year has been a terrible example of this dynamic. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans. Why overturn policies that have protected the environment magnificently for years?
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 3, 2026FS-2025-0001-310860
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 2, 2026FS-2025-0001-301602
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I am a fan of the existence of roadless areas. They provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. The vast majority of wildfires are caused by humans, and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. With the agency's multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system, building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 2, 2026FS-2025-0001-303078
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 2, 2026FS-2025-0001-306011
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    This new rule to allow roads in wilderness areas is insane!! We must protect these areas against fires so future generations will be able to enjoy our wilderness areas undisturbed!! I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-295762
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 35 submissions in its group.

    I am strongly opposed to the the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the “2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule.” Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal. Reaffirm America’s commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-296729
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-296933
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    America's parks are sacred. I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-296981
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I very much oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these real problems. I strongly urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-296982
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    As a concerned American, I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule! Keeping roadless areas provides recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans! Thank you.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  16. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-297196
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans. We need the healing power of Nature and roadless areas more than ever.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  17. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-297307
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans. Sincerely, Linda McVarish
    Full analysis of this comment →
  18. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-297359
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Protecting the waters in these areas is meaningful considering the drought that many of us are facing. There is no way to compensate for the damage done; once it's damaged it's gone. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  19. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-297440
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. It saves downstream communities millions of dollars in water-filtration costs. Research shows that human-caused ignitions cause the vast majority of wildfires and are roughly four times more likely to ignite near roads. Additionally, for 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I deeply object to commercializing and profiting from forests they we realized years ago, needed to be protected. I urge the USDA to drop this proposal and commit to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  20. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-297484
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 35 submissions in its group.

    The Department of Agriculture/Forest Service proposal to repeal or weaken the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule would be a disastrous mistake. Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities and safe drinking water for millions of Americans. For 25 years, the agency has had a multi-billion-dollar deferred maintenance backlog for its road system. Building more roads will only deepen these problems. I strongly urge the USDA to abandon this proposal and reaffirm your commitment to protecting our roadless forests for wildlife habitat, clean water, climate resilience, and recreation for all Americans.
    Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless