The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments24 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 5middle half 5–5 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
24 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 22, 2026FS-2025-0001-470019
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife and plants which provide critical ecosystem services. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-460376
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Keep the Roadless Rule in place. Protect biodiversity and native plants, wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor recreation, and climate-resilient forests for future generations. No Action Alternative: Ask the USDA to move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. Protect Our Last Intact National Forests: The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Protect Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity: Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Keep Drinking Water Clean: Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk: Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-460509
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Keep the Roadless Rule in place. Protect biodiversity and native plants, wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor recreation, and climate-resilient forests for future generations. No Action Alternative: Ask the USDA to move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. Protect Our Last Intact National Forests: The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Protect Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity: Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Keep Drinking Water Clean: Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk: Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 21, 2026FS-2025-0001-461257
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Please move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest near where I live. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. Thank you!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-416076
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose changes to the existing Roadless Conservation Area Rule, and support No Action Alternative 1, Keeping the Roadless Rule intact. The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-416161
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    I ask the USDA to move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-416252
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    No Action Alternative USDA: PLEASE move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. Protect Our Last Intact National Forests The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Protect Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Keep Drinking Water Clean Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. Stella Kovacs stellakovacs@me.com
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-416483
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Please keep the Roadless Rule in place. We need to protect biodiversity and native plants, wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor recreation, and climate-resilient forests for future generations.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-416505
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Hello USDA - Please move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. Protect Our Last Intact National Forests The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Protect Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Keep Drinking Water Clean Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-416903
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Please move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest where I live. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region and other locations. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. We don't need roads in natural conservation areas!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-427399
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    The USDA should move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. Do the right thing for future generations.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 15, 2026FS-2025-0001-415957
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Please keep the Roadless Rule in place. Protect biodiversity and native plants, wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor recreation, and climate-resilient forests for future generations. Thank you! Jim Boulter, Santa Barbara, CA 93103
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-353074
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Please move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. Protect Our Last Intact National Forests The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development. Protect Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Keep Drinking Water Clean Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. Keep the Roadless Rule in place. Protect biodiversity and native plants, wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor recreation, and climate-resilient forests for future generations.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-327856
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    No Action Alternative Please move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. Protect Our Last Intact National Forests The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Protect Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Keep Drinking Water Clean Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. Thank you!!!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 4, 2026FS-2025-0001-312339
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Please keep the Roadless Rule in place to protect biodiversity and native plants, wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor recreation, and climate-resilient forests for future generations. Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Roadless areas also protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Again, please keep our forests wild!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  16. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 2, 2026FS-2025-0001-304347
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact. Protect Our Last Intact National Forests The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Protect Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Keep Drinking Water Clean Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  17. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-295165
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    I would like to ask the USDA to move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rules intact. Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Despite claims that the repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  18. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 1, 2026FS-2025-0001-299197
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    Keep Roadless Rule Intact: More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk. This is a no-brainer = The more roads, the more humans, the more wildfires. That’s it. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  19. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-279206
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 24 submissions in its group.

    To whom it may concern: Please move forward with the No Action Alternative 1 and keep the Roadless Rule intact to protect our last intact national forests and the wildlife and biodiversity they contain, as well as preserving our water quality so there is water for us to drink. The Roadless Rule safeguards some of the most pristine and undeveloped national forest lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development. Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. Also, more roads mean more wildfire risk. Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities. All my best, Corina Logan
    Full analysis of this comment →
  20. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Aug 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-279669
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 24 submissions in its group.

    lands in the country, including the Los Padres National Forest. Repealing these protections would open over 40 million acres to new road construction and increased industrial development, including over 600,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest. Protect Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity Roadless forests provide vital habitat for wildlife, including mountain lions, black bears, the California Condor, and many more throughout the Los Padres region. Building roads fragments ecosystems and puts biodiversity at risk, including not just these iconic animal species but also the native plant ecosystems on which they rely. Keep Drinking Water Clean Roadless areas protect critical watersheds and headwaters that provide clean drinking water to communities across the nation. More roads can lead to erosion, sedimentation, and declining water quality. More Roads Mean More Wildfire Risk Despite claims that repeal would improve wildfire management, research shows that wildfires are more likely to start near roads because roads increase human access and ignition sources. Existing roadless protections already allow many forest management and fire mitigation activities.
    Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless