The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments18 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 5middle half 5–5 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
18 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–18Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-431403
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    I am asking you to stop the roll back of the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. These lands belong to ALL Americans, not to corporations trying to make a quick unethical profit.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-431581
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    As a citizen who loves our public lands and wants to see our common wealth preserved for posterity, I oppose the proposal to rescind the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. I call on you to defend our forests and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail and to serve as responsible stewards of the lands that have been so long protected and that are my grandchildren's patrimony.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-379603
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule as this could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. Please defend our forests and watersheds from logging and road building and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-382682
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    Do NOT rescind the Roadless Rule. It could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. We need to defend our forests and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 13, 2026FS-2025-0001-374182
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    There has been broad public opposition to its plan and yet, the administration is moving forward with plans to roll back the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. This could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. Please defend our forests and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 13, 2026FS-2025-0001-374297
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    Vote NO! Do not roll back the Roadless Rule. Despite broad public opposition to its plan, the administration is moving forward with plans to roll back the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. This calls upon us to defend our forests and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-342555
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 18 submissions in its group.

    I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed rollback of the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. This is an unacceptable outcome and I do not support this effort.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-342942
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    I want to state my opposition to the proposed removal (FS-2025-0001-223869) of the 2001 “Roadless Rule," designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. The administration is moving forward in spite of broad public opposition to its plan. It's on us to defend our forests and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-343901
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    Do not rescind the roadless rule protection. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. We must continue to protect our vital natural resources.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-344008
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    I oppose rescinding this rule. Doing so could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-344072
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    The existing Roadless Rule was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding, for good reasons. Rescinding the rule could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. This includes vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail. We must continue to protect these valuable natural areas as they are.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-344202
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    I strongly oppose the proposal to rescind the Roadless Rule. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. Don't do it.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-347003
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    Rescinding the Roadless Rule could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. California is its land and water. Please keep the rule in place.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-350492
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    Despite broad public opposition to its plan, the administration is moving forward with plans to roll back the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. Recklessly destroying our natural resources and abandoning our health and safety is irresponsible and short-sighted.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-363516
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    Rescinding the Roadless Rule could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. Please defend our forests and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  16. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-363631
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    The Roadless Rule was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. Do not change this policy, for the sake of our future generations.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  17. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-363716
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    I am in opposition to the proposed removal of the “Roadless Rule”. Despite broad public opposition to its plan, the administration is moving forward with plans to roll back the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. The NRDC calls upon us to defend our forests and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  18. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-364799
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 18 submissions in its group.

    I oppose any plans to roll back the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which was designed to protect forests and watersheds from logging and roadbuilding. Rescinding it could put nearly 1,800 miles of protected rivers and streams at risk, fueling wildfires and potentially exposing 25 million Americans to polluted drinking water. I am calling on the Forest Service to do the right thing and to defend our forests and protect vital public lands like California’s Tahoe National Forest and the Appalachian Trail. Thank you. Sincerely, Jane Bruno, Palm Beach Gardens, FL
    Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless