The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments26 submissions

Position

Opposes rescission 100.0%

Answerability

A1 strong 0
A2 moderate 0
A3 weak 0
A0 none 1

Substance /24

Median 1middle half 1–1 · 1 scored

Topics raised

26 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-556495
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule Nancy Bland Sincerely, Nancy Bland
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 29, 2026FS-2025-0001-509926
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and Sincerely, Leta Georgiopoulos
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-495682
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Please don't give in to the big moneyed land developers and energy companies. There are things more important than making a buck. Sincerely, Michael Gorcynski mpgorczynski@yahoo.com Sincerely, Michael Gorcynski
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-500728
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. Our national forests and national parks represent the heart of what is important to America. Taking away the Roadless Rule puts profits ahead of nature and all it gives that is immeasurable. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Paula Frazee-sperling weimfamily@yahoo.com Frazee-Sperling Sincerely, Paula Frazee-Sperling
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-500812
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, Dear USDA, STOP IT!! QUIT ATTACKING WHAT BELONGS TO ALL OF US! I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Kathleen Moore kathleencedar@earthlink.net Sincerely, Kathleen Moore
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-500856
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths. They protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people, and remove carbon from the atmosphere. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Cindy Stern cdstern@twcny.rr.com Sincerely, Ms. Cindy Stern
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-500970
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. The preserved areas of the United States cannot be restored within ten lifetimes once they have been compromised. We owe it to ourselves and our descendants to preserve these areas that provide clean air, water, and medicines to the American people and the rest of the world. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Erin Pence epence@erie.pa.us Sincerely, Erin Pence
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-500992
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. We are the richest country in the world. Wise people respect and conserve their natural gifts, respect the diversity of living things, and don't reduce our world to stumps and concrete. Our patriotism to this land is not about dollars. The greedy are never satisfied. Think science and patriotism. We have plenty of money, houses and roads. Give the earth peace and respect. America needs to model and lead in protection and care of our planet. We have no other home. Sincerely, Susan Decker susandecker73@yahoo.com Sincerely, Susan Decker
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501174
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. The areas proposed for inclusion in this repeal generate millions of dollars annually for tourism, outdoor activities and financial support for lots of small towns that depend on these activities for income. In my own state of North Carolina, the western parts of the state would be dramatically affected and would devastate the incomes of people who depend on tourism. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Ken Burleson kwburleson@gmail.com Sincerely, Ken Burleson
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501381
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule because of the habitat fragmentation it will cause, which in turn will cause harm to many species of wildlife. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, James Close jamesclose@earthlink.net Sincerely, James Close
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501404
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I oppose repealing the Roadless Rule and urge the U.S. Forest Service to keep these protections in place. I value our undeveloped national forests for clean water, wildlife habitat, recreation, and the opportunity to keep wild places intact for future generations. Please protect these lands from unnecessary road building and development. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Wesley Draker wdraker77@gmail.com Sincerely, Wesley Draker
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501426
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am very worried about some of the actions that I'm hearing coming from our leadership. The people who are in charge of keeping our wildlife and forestry safe so that we may have clean water, so that we may have clean air, so that we may have recreation areas and beauty in our country. Repealing this forestry Roadless Rule act it's not a step forward. It is a step backwards and it hurts our country. I beg you please do not do this! I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, suspie@comcast.net Susan Pierce Sincerely, Susan Pierce
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501427
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, Besides stealing from this current generation, this will be theft from every generation of Americans born in the future. ANYONE who 'claims' that this will not damage our wilderness or open these lands to present and future development and exploitation is simply not telling the truth, and we both know this. The real, Raymond C. Elmore I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Raymond Elmore triumph_yet@yahoo.com Sincerely, Mr. Raymond Elmore
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501433
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. I recently saw a dead deer that had been hit by a car on a small highway that goes through some forested land. I've seen dead deer in this area quite frequently. If roads are put through our forests, we'll see more and more dead animals on roads. This is also dangerous for the drivers of the cars. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Monica Hampton monicajhampton@mac.com Sincerely, Monica Hampton
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501450
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, Dear Public Official, As an avid outdoorswoman, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, hunt, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. Visitors to surrounding areas bring millions and millions of dollars to nearby communities that depend on these resources. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Laura Lusa lauraleelusa@gmail.com Sincerely, Laura Lusa
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501460
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Gail Landy 17600 Silver Dollar CT Gaithersburg, MD 20877 Sincerely, Gail Landy ag7dollar@msn.com Sincerely, Ms. Gail Landy
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-501643
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, To Whom It May Concern: I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. There is little of commercial value in these areas; ie timber, grazing, etc. so why build roads. The FS already has more miles of road than can be maintained. I know this, I spent over 30 years in the woods. This is just a political game, don't buy into it. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Fred Dauber fldauber@gmail.com Sincerely, Mr. Fred Dauber
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-502302
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, Once the majestic trees are gone, habitat, ecological balance, improved air quality, and surrounding communities will be bear the brunt of their removal; and we won't see anything like the growth targeted in national forests or many generations. I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Rebecca Stimson rstimson@comcast.net Sincerely, Rebecca Stimson
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-502371
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule. It took several years of cross-community conversations and reviews to come up with the Roadless Rule and determine which areas it would cover. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. I urge you to change course and preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Peter Levon plevon@aol.com Sincerely, Dr. Peter Levon
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Sep 28, 2026FS-2025-0001-502419
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 26 submissions in its group.
Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I am writing to ask that you do everything you can to protect the Roadless Rule. For 25 years, this rule has helped keep millions of acres of national forests intact. These are places where we hike, camp, fish, and explore the outdoors. They also preserve vital wildlife migration paths and protect the streams and rivers that provide drinking water for more than 60 million people. If the rule is repealed, nearly 45 million acres could become vulnerable to development. Once roads are built and forests are broken apart, it may be impossible to restore what was lost. Please don't slash protections that benefit people, wildlife, and communities. Instead, work with states, Indigenous groups, local residents, and land managers to address changing needs without repealing this essential rule. Our wild lands are some of our greatest national treasures. I urge you to preserve the Roadless Rule for current and future generations. Sincerely, Teri Kowiak teri_voicestudio@hotmail.com Sincerely, Ms. Teri Kowiak
Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:

Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.