The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments22 submissions
Position
  • Opposes rescission 100.0%
Answerability
  • A1 strong 0
  • A2 moderate 0
  • A3 weak 0
  • A0 none 1
Substance /24
Median 1middle half 1–1 · 1 scored
Topics raised
Count
Position
Answerability
Substance /24
Order
22 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–20Clear all filters
  1. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-601461
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  2. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-608882
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  3. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 7, 2026FS-2025-0001-611739
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  4. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-578052
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  5. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-581531
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  6. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-586810
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  7. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-587361
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts. The best thing about these lands are their natural unadulterated beauty.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  8. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-587427
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  9. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-589557
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts. Americans deserve a clean and beautiful environment for future generations to enjoy!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  10. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-589636
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  11. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-589814
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts. Americans deserve a clean and beautiful environment for future generations to enjoy!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  12. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-590030
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  13. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-590259
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    l support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  14. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-591445
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  15. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-592442
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  16. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-592680
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    Hi my name is Consuela, I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt the wildlife, outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  17. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 6, 2026FS-2025-0001-599271
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts.
    Full analysis of this comment →
  18. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-560796
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 22 submissions in its group.

    Hello, I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts. Sincerely, Dr. Gwyneth Manser (PhD)
    Full analysis of this comment →
  19. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-560893
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    Hand off the parks, lakes and trees! I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts. We need trees to breathe!
    Full analysis of this comment →
  20. Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24Oct 5, 2026FS-2025-0001-561511
    PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW

    Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 22 submissions in its group.

    I support the roadless rule and keeping areas of our National Forests protected from road building, mining, and logging. Please do not repeal the roadless rule, as this will hurt outdoor recreation and conservation efforts!
    Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless