Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I am a hiker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24

1,549 submissions
176 versions of the text
158 added words of their own

TopicsClimate Carbon Storage Environmental Protection Biodiversity Recreation Tourism Public Use Water Quality Quantity

The letter's full analysis →Every submission of it →

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 20Sep 12Oct 6

Aug 21: 520 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

Roadless areas: + Dark Divide

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-228982, the comment that stands for the group.

I am a hiker who cares deeply about our national forests. I support the Roadless Rule and Alternative 1 - No Action in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that would continue current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Roadless Rule is extremely important to the outdoor recreation community. The current proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule would remove protections on more than 25,000 miles of trails nationally. Road construction in Inventoried Roadless Areas will damage watersheds, fragment landscapes and may increase the number of wildland fires. Eliminating the Roadless Rule is unpopular and unnecessary. Thousands of hikers like me enjoy trails in Roadless Areas. Please do not rescind the Roadless Rule.

← All campaigns