Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“Wildlands and roadless areas are a core part of Washington’s identity and economy. Washington State’s two…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24
  • 66 submissions
  • 5 versions of the text
  • 0 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 24Aug 29Sep 28

Aug 24: 43 submissions, 1 unique comments

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-265419, the comment that stands for the group.

Wildlands and roadless areas are a core part of Washington’s identity and economy. Washington State’s two million acres of roadless areas provide robust recreation and tourism, protect clean water, protect endangered salmon, reduce wildfire risk, protect wildlife habitat, provide carbon storage, and protect subsistence and cultural values. Expanding roadbuilding and access to these areas will degrade values that Washington communities rely on and increase the likelihood of uncharacteristic wildfire—the vast majority of which is sparked by human ignitions in proximity to roads. I strongly oppose the proposed rule, and any other measures to repeal or weaken the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The ecological and financial costs of repealing the rule are substantial. We need roadless rule protections to be maintained for communities of today and the next generation. Roadbuilding and logging will destroy recreation areas, harm fisheries, threaten drinking water sources, degrade wildlife habitat, increase risk of wildfire, exacerbate climate change, harm cultural resources, and hinder the exercise of Tribal sovereignty.
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless