Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I urge the U.S. Forest Service to keep intact the existing…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 1/24
  • 2,052 submissions
  • 1,973 versions of the text
  • 2,029 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Sep 1Sep 21Oct 6

Sep 14: 308 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

Roadless areas
+ Clear Creek+ Copper Mountain+ Oak Creek+ Santa Teresa+ White Mountain+ Willow Creek

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-391332, the comment that stands for the group.

Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, I urge the U.S. Forest Service to keep intact the existing Roadless Area Conservation Rule (“Roadless Rule”), which protects nearly 45 million acres of our nation's forests and grasslands. Prior to the rule's implementation in 2001, industrial logging and accompanying roadbuilding disrupted and destroyed 3.2 million acres of fragile habitat annually while also degrading clean water supplies and limiting outdoor recreation opportunities. For a quarter century, the Roadless Rule has protected ecologically sensitive landscapes, wildlife populations and habitat, and communities dependent upon their services. The rule protects countless wild animals, including imperiled species who rely on intact habitats for survival. Additionally, these lands provide clean water and support numerous recreational activities that sustain local jobs and economies. The rule allows for flexibility in resource management, with exceptions for vegetation management and road construction projects in the interest of public health and safety. The American public overwhelmingly supports the Roadless Rule; recent bipartisan polling shows that 77% of voters support conserving roadless lands. Indeed, the rule was created with input from over 1.6 million comments and, in September, over half a million Americans responded to the U.S. Forest Service's notice of intent to repeal the Roadless Rule with comments voicing strong opposition. We have made our opinion clear time and time again–our public lands should remain public, not be degraded for the interests of private industry. I strongly urge the U.S. Forest Service not to repeal the Roadless Rule, as keeping the rule intact will protect our shared forestlands for generations to come. Jamie Shields 523 E. 2nd Street, OR 97048 Sincerely, Mrs. Jamie Shields
← All campaigns

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless