“I am writing as an outdoor recreation enthusiast to comment on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)…”

I am writing as an outdoor recreation enthusiast to comment on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) regarding rescission of the 2001 Roadless Rule. I oppose full rescission and request that the USDA and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) instead pursue Alternative 1- the No Action alternative. I urge the agency to weigh public feedback, the economic implications on all public lands stakeholders, and scientific evidence carefully before finalizing this decision. The Roadless Rule is one of America's most popular conservation policies, and was supported by over 1.6 million public comments in favor of its establishment 25 years ago. It remains an effective tool to protect public lands for future generations. As someone who recreates in our National Forests, I rely on Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) for a variety of activities. Additional road construction, increased timber harvesting, and extraction will degrade experiences for users like me. I urge USDA and USFS to fully weigh the recreational value provided for millions of Americans across the country before proceeding. Beyond recreation, roadless areas power rural economies; support wildlife habitat and water quality for millions of Americans; and, promote climate resilience. Rolling back these protections for short-term extractive gain risks trading durable, sustainable economic and ecosystem benefits for the communities I care about. People like me, who contribute to local economies through visitation and spending, deserve a voice in these decisions. I ask that the agency fully account for the irreversible economic, environmental, and social consequences a full repeal would set in motion. These impacts will be felt by my community for generations to come. Decisions of this magnitude impacting our nation’s public lands demand transparency, public input, and a thorough analysis and understanding of their consequences. I ask that USDA and USFS prioritize public feedback, sound science, and the vitality of local communities and economies as this process moves forward. Retain the 2001 Roadless Rule in its entirety. Sincerely, Mr Jeff Martin Portland, OR