Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24
  • 12 submissions
  • 1 version of the text
  • 0 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Sep 10Sep 13Sep 15

Sep 11: 4 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

Roadless areas
Middle Fork

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-345110, the comment that stands for the group.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless