Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I am commenting to express my strong opposition to the Forest Service's proposal to rescind the Roadless Rule…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24
  • 845 submissions
  • 69 versions of the text
  • 52 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 29Sep 21Oct 6

Sep 14: 325 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

National Forests
+ Chattahoochee National Forest

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-371680, the comment that stands for the group.

I am commenting to express my strong opposition to the Forest Service's proposal to rescind the Roadless Rule. For the last 25 years, the Roadless Rule has safeguarded some of Georgia's wildest forests from unnecessary roadbuilding and harmful development. Getting rid of the rule would harm these incredible public lands and the thousands of communities that rely on them. Roadless areas provide measurable and immeasurable benefits. They contribute to clean drinking water to downstream communities, such as Chatsworth, Ellijay, Blairsville, and Hiawassee in north Georgia. Roadless areas are home to cold, crystal-clear trout fishing streams, boast world-class hiking and mountain biking trails, support local businesses, provide habitat for at-risk animal species, and offer unmatched experiences for visitors looking to get away from the noise and commotion of roads. Getting rid of the Roadless Rule puts all these incredible benefits at risk. While the Forest Service has claimed that getting rid of the Roadless Rule will help prevent wildfires, this is not true. Wildfires are four times more likely to start near a road than in a roadless forest. And the Roadless Rule already allows the Forest Service to do wildfire prevention work in roadless areas. In addition, the Forest Service cannot maintain the roads it already has. Roads are expensive to build and maintain, as shown by the agency's current $9 billion road maintenance backlog. Unmaintained roads can lead to landslides and lower water quality, which threatens the health of entire ecosystems. The agency can't afford what it has and should not worsen the situation by adding more roads, especially in these spectacularly wild places. I strongly urge you to scrap this reckless proposal and to keep the Roadless Rule in place, so that future generations of hikers, anglers, mountain bikers, hunters, climbers, birders, and paddlers can enjoy these amazing roadless places.
← All campaigns

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless