Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“Dear Secretary Rollins, I strongly oppose the Proposed Rule rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule. Rolling back…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 3/24

236 submissions
230 versions of the text
216 added words of their own

TopicsEnvironmental Protection Biodiversity Recreation Tourism Public Use Resource Development Extraction

The letter's full analysis →Every submission of it →

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 21Sep 9Oct 6

Aug 21: 36 submissions, 1 unique comments

What it names

National Forests: + Custer National Forest+ Gallatin National Forest
Roadless areas: + Middle Fork

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-231767, the comment that stands for the group.

Dear Secretary Rollins, I strongly oppose the Proposed Rule rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule. Rolling back the Roadless Rule will open irreplaceable Montana landscapes up to large-scale logging, road construction, and other development that will industrialize our national forests. The Roadless Rule has protected irreplaceable roadless values while permitting fire suppression, fuels mitigation work, trail maintenance, and other forest management activities for the past 25 years. It is a fiscally responsible, environmentally sound, multiple-use management tool. Please adopt the No Action alternative for the Final Rule. Don't let our lands be destroyed. It's up to you. Sincerely, Victoria Beardsley

← All campaigns