Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“To the U.S. Forest Service and Department of Agriculture, I am writing to you in order to oppose the repealing…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24
  • 18 submissions
  • 17 versions of the text
  • 18 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 31Sep 5Sep 11

Sep 9: 5 submissions, 0 unique comments

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-353570, the comment that stands for the group.

To the U.S. Forest Service and Department of Agriculture, I am writing to you in order to oppose the repealing of the roadless rule, established in 2001. For more than 25 years, this rule has helped protect some of our country's most intact national forests from unnecessary road construction, commercial logging, and industrial development. Repealing it would make it much easier to open millions of acres of public land to new roads, timber harvests, and future oil, gas, mineral, and coal development. New roads do much more than change the landscape. They fragment wildlife habitat, increase erosion, threaten clean water, create pathways for invasive species, and make previously remote areas more vulnerable to development and other damaging extraction processes. We should not weaken protections for our threatened intact forests at a time when they are increasingly important for wildlife, recreation, clean water, and carbon storage. Wildfire mitigation and forest health work can be done without dismantling protections across tens of millions of acres. Public lands belong to all of us, and once these forests are logged, drilled, or developed, we cannot simply restore what was lost. Therefore, I urge the USDA and U.S. Forest Service to withdraw this proposal and keep the 2001 Roadless Rule in place. Thank you for considering my comment and for protecting our public lands from development. Hands off our lands.
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless