Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“The Forest Service should keep the Roadless Rule intact exactly as it is. Do not weaken or repeal this…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 4/24

7,106 submissions
7,089 versions of the text
7,031 added words of their own

TopicsEnvironmental Protection Biodiversity Public Opinion Support Water Quality Quantity

The letter's full analysis →Every submission of it →

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 21Sep 13Oct 6

Sep 9: 326 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

National Forests: + Allegheny National Forest+ Angeles National Forest+ Black Hills National Forest+ Bridger-Teton National Forest+ Buffalo Gap National Grassland+ Chattahoochee National Forest+ Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest+ Chugach National Forest+ Cleveland National Forest+ Colville National Forest+ Daniel Boone National Forest+ Francis Marion National Forest+ George Washington National Forest+ Gifford Pinchot National Forest+ Gila National Forest+ Hiawatha National Forest+ Hoosier National Forest+ Lewis and Clark National Forest+ Lincoln National Forest+ Los Padres National Forest+ Mark Twain National Forest+ Monongahela National Forest+ Nantahala National Forest+ Ocala National Forest+ Olympic National Forest+ Pisgah National Forest+ Sequoia National Forest+ Shawnee National Forest+ Superior National Forest+ Tongass National Forest+ Tonto National Forest+ Wenatchee National Forest+ White Mountain National Forest+ Willamette National Forest
Roadless areas: + Cheoah Bald+ Craggy Mountain+ El Capitan+ Fish Canyon+ Fox Creek+ Green Mountain+ Moonlight Dome+ North Mountain+ Pond Pine B+ Poverty Creek+ Santa Rosa+ Sheep Mountain+ Smoky Mountains+ Snowy Range+ South Mills River+ South Quinault+ Tusquitee Bald+ Wesser Bald+ White Mountain+ Wilderness Study Area+ Wilson Creek
Works cited: + Andrews et al. 2015+ Balch et al. 2017+ DellaSala et al. 2011

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-243652, the comment that stands for the group.

The Forest Service should keep the Roadless Rule intact exactly as it is. Do not weaken or repeal this critical policy. National forests are the heart of our public lands. The Roadless Area Conservation Rule protects some of the wildest forests we have left, forests that protect critical wildlife habitat and drinking water for millions. Revoking the Roadless Rule puts landscapes, wildlife, and communities at risk. Not only is the Roadless Rule good policy, it's also wildly popular across the country, with over 600,000 people submitting comments to the US Forest Service last year in support of keeping the rule in place. And more than 20 years ago, the American people overwhelmingly called for our national forests to be protected for future generations. Revoking the Roadless Rule would destroy the natural inheritance we leave for our children. The Forest Service should keep the Roadless Rule intact exactly as it is. Do not weaken or repeal this critical policy. National forests are the heart of our public lands. The Roadless Area Conservation Rule protects some of the wildest forests we have left, forests that protect critical wildlife habitat and drinking water for millions. Revoking the Roadless Rule puts landscapes, wildlife, and communities at risk. Not only is the Roadless Rule good policy, it's also wildly popular across the country, with over 600,000 people submitting comments to the US Forest Service last year in support of keeping the rule in place. And more than 20 years ago, the American people overwhelmingly called for our national forests to be protected for future generations. Revoking the Roadless Rule would destroy the natural inheritance we leave for our children. The Forest Service should keep the Roadless Rule intact exactly as it is. Do not weaken or repeal this critical policy. National forests are the heart of our public lands. The Roadless Area Conservation Rule protects some of the wildest forests we have left, forests that protect critical wildlife habitat and drinking water for millions. Revoking the Roadless Rule puts landscapes, wildlife, and communities at risk. Not only is the Roadless Rule good policy, it's also wildly popular across the country, with over 600,000 people submitting comments to the US Forest Service last year in support of keeping the rule in place. And more than 20 years ago, the American people overwhelmingly called for our national forests to be protected for future generations. Revoking the Roadless Rule would destroy the natural inheritance we leave for our children. The Forest Service should keep the Roadless Rule intact exactly as it is. Do not weaken or repeal this critical policy. National forests are the heart of our public lands. The Roadless Area Conservation Rule protects some of the wildest forests we have left, forests that protect critical wildlife habitat and drinking water for millions. Revoking the Roadless Rule puts landscapes, wildlife, and communities at risk. Not only is the Roadless Rule good policy, it's also wildly popular across the country, with over 600,000 people submitting comments to the US Forest Service last year in support of keeping the rule in place. And more than 20 years ago, the American people overwhelmingly called for our national forests to be protected for future generations. Revoking the Roadless Rule would destroy the natural inheritance we leave for our children.

← All campaigns