Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the U.S. Forest Service’s proposal to…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 5/24
  • 20 submissions
  • 20 versions of the text
  • 5 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 29Sep 2Sep 13

Aug 30: 6 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

Roadless areas
Laurel MountainSouth Mills River

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-300635, the comment that stands for the group.

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the U.S. Forest Service’s proposal to repeal the 2001 Roadless Rule in North Carolina. Rescinding these federal protections places 172,000 acres of pristine, Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) within the Pisgah and Nantahala National Forests at immediate risk of commercial logging, industrial development, and habitat-fragmenting road construction. These backcountry areas—including critical watersheds and iconic landscapes like the Linville Gorge, Laurel Mountain, and the South Mills River—are invaluable to the state of North Carolina for several critical reasons: Watershed Protection and Climate Resilience: These 172,000 acres act as a vital, natural filtration system that supplies clean drinking water to hundreds of thousands of residents across Western North Carolina. Maintaining intact, unfragmented forest floors is our best natural defense against catastrophic soil erosion and severe downstream flooding, which increasingly threaten our mountain communities. Economic Impact on Tourism and Recreation: Western North Carolina’s multi-billion-dollar outdoor recreation economy relies directly on the wild, uninterrupted nature of these public lands. Opening these backcountry areas to industrial use will permanently degrade the world-class hiking, fly-fishing, and climbing experiences that draw visitors from around the globe and support local businesses. Irreplaceable Biodiversity: The Pisgah and Nantahala National Forests harbor unique, ancient ecosystems and endangered wildlife species that cannot survive the disruption brought by heavy machinery and road corridors. Relying solely on local, shifting forest management plans does not offer the permanent, ironclad security that the 2001 Roadless Rule provides. I urge the U.S. Forest Service and the Department of Agriculture to reject this rollback and maintain the full, existing federal protections for North Carolina's backcountry. Thank you for your time and consideration of these public comments.
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless