Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I am writing in opposition to the proposed rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule, docket…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA3 weakSubstance 6/24
  • 11 submissions
  • 11 versions of the text
  • 5 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Sep 18Sep 21Oct 6

Oct 4: 3 submissions, 0 unique comments

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-449471, the comment that stands for the group.

I am writing in opposition to the proposed rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule, docket FS-2025-0001, and to ask the Forest Service to select the no-action alternative. The agency calls this wildfire policy, but its own 2020 research found roadless and roaded forests burn at similar rates, and fires are far likelier to start near a road than in roadless forest. About 91 percent of Oregon roadless forest, some 1.66 million acres, sits in municipal watersheds serving roughly 800,000 people, and roads send sediment into the cold streams that marbled murrelets and coho depend on. More than 625,000 comments came in during 2025, a 2026 Pew poll found 76 percent of voters want the rule kept, and the agency faces an 11.2 billion dollar road-maintenance backlog while proposing to build more. Roadless national forests are among the best remaining habitat for species already in trouble, giving refuge to hundreds of vulnerable wildlife species (Dietz et al., 2021). On the Oregon coast that means salmon, elk, and seabirds like the marbled murrelet, all of which depend on unroaded, unfragmented forest and the cold, clean streams that roads degrade. Roadless forests store carbon far out of proportion to their size. On national forest lands, inventoried roadless areas hold about 22 percent of the mature-forest carbon and 27 percent of the old-growth carbon (Birdsey et al., 2025). Logging them releases carbon we cannot afford to lose and cannot quickly get back. Outdoor recreation is a major Oregon industry, supporting about 192,000 jobs, 16 billion dollars in spending, and 12.4 billion dollars of the state economy (Oregon Parks and Recreation Department, 2022). Roadless backcountry is the setting for much of the hunting, fishing, and hiking that sustains it, and new roads and logging trade a recurring economy for a one-time cut. For these reasons I ask the Forest Service to withdraw the proposal and retain the 2001 Roadless Rule. Thank you for considering my comment. Sincerely, Steven Trotter Waldport, Oregon
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless