Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“Not enough nature preserved already Our public lands are not for sale! I am writing today to express my strong…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24
  • 30 submissions
  • 30 versions of the text
  • 27 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Aug 21Sep 3Oct 5

Aug 22: 6 submissions, 0 unique comments

What it names

National Forests
+ Allegheny National Forest

Names marked + were added by senders and are not in the shared letter.

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-259080, the comment that stands for the group.

Not enough nature preserved already Our public lands are not for sale! I am writing today to express my strong opposition to the Trump administration’s proposal to rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule. This harmful proposal would open millions of acres of federal lands to massive roadbuilding, logging, or other extractive projects and sidestep critical environmental reviews and safeguards for endangered species. It ignores science-based forest management and would put public land and waterways at risk for human-caused impacts such as increased wildfires, species loss and water and air pollution. National forests and BLM lands provide critical habitat for wildlife, as well as old-growth forests that help fight climate change. These pristine lands help filter and preserve drinking water for millions of Americans and are critical in reducing carbon needed for a healthy and stable climate. As an older generation American, I learned when I was young that our public lands belong to all Americans—for these public lands are an important part of what makes the U.S. special. These lands should not be used to benefit extractive industries, corporate polluters or private interests. They should be held in trust for all Americans, for generations to come. And adding roads will not help manage or protect these areas as suggested by this proposal. Rather, it will make our lands more vulnerable to human-caused impacts. The public deserves an opportunity to have our voices heard. There should be an adequate public comment period before anything happens on our lands. So I am asking you now to protect our public lands by opposing this proposal to rescind the Roadless Rule.
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless