Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I oppose the rollback of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this rule has…”

Small family: One letter sent by 3 to 9 people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 2/24
  • 4 submissions
  • 4 versions of the text
  • 3 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Oct 1

Oct 1: 4 submissions, 1 unique comments

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-530956, the comment that stands for the group.

I oppose the rollback of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. For more than two decades, this rule has protected much of the wildness that remains in our national forests. The protections have been particularly vital in the Midwest, where less than 200,000 acres of roadless, untrammeled forest lands survived the widespread logging of the past two centuries. From Wisconsin's Chequamegon-Nicolet to Michigan's Ottawa, Hiawatha, and Huron-Manistee, the Midwest’s national forests have important roadless areas that provide critical habitat for wildlife, clean our drinking water, store carbon, and offer refuge for people seeking quiet and beauty. These roadless areas are also an enormous resource for the recreation economy in the Midwest. I urge you to stop rolling back protections for our public lands and leave our last wild forests intact. Please keep the Roadless Rule in place. Sincerely, Ms Grace van Kan 2635 W Rice St Apt 2 Chicago, IL 60622-5438 ghvankan@gmail.com (312) 286-2484
← All campaigns

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless