Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

“I am commenting to express my strong opposition to the Forest Service's proposal to rescind the Roadless Rule…”

Campaign: One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. It counts as one unique comment. The record does not say which organisation ran it.

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 3/24
  • 20 submissions
  • 1 version of the text
  • 0 added words of their own

When it arrived

Submissions received each day. Tap or hover a bar for its count.

Oct 5Oct 6

Oct 5: 16 submissions, 1 unique comments

The letter

As sent in FS-2025-0001-562796, the comment that stands for the group.

I am commenting to express my strong opposition to the Forest Service's proposal to rescind the Roadless Rule. For the last 25 years, the Roadless Rule has safeguarded some of Georgia's wildest forests from unnecessary roadbuilding and harmful development. Rescinding the rule would harm these incredible public lands, outdoor recreation and the thousands of communities that rely on them. Roadless areas provide measurable and immeasurable benefits. They contribute to clean drinking water to downstream communities, such as Chatsworth, Ellijay, Blairsville, and Hiawassee in north Georgia. Roadless areas are home to cold, crystal-clear trout fishing streams, boast world-class hiking and mountain biking trails, support local businesses, provide habitat for at-risk animal species, and offer unmatched experiences for visitors looking to get away from the noise and commotion of roads. To rescind the Roadless Rule puts all these incredible benefits at risk. While the Forest Service has claimed that eliminating the Roadless Rule will help prevent wildfires, this is not true. Wildfires are four times more likely to start near a road than in a roadless forest. And the Roadless Rule already allows the Forest Service to do wildfire prevention work in roadless areas. In addition, the Forest Service cannot maintain the roads it already has. Roads are expensive to build and maintain, as shown by the agency's current $9 billion road maintenance backlog. Unmaintained roads can lead to landslides and lower water quality, which threatens the health of entire ecosystems. Also, unmaintained roads with perched culverts can block passage of wild fish. The agency can't afford what it has and should not worsen the situation by adding more roads, especially in these spectacularly wild places. I strongly urge you to oppose this reckless proposal and to keep the Roadless Rule in place, so that future generations of hikers, anglers, mountain bikers, hunters, climbers, birders, and paddlers can enjoy these amazing roadless places.
← All campaigns

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:
Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Public Comment Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. Position and topic classification is performed by a large language model (the open-weight Qwen3.8 27B) that reads each comment and labels its position — supports, opposes, or neutral — and the topics it raises. Copies and campaigns are found by hashes of the text and the overlap of six-to-eight-word phrases, grouped into text families; every unique figure counts one family once. Sentence embeddings (Qwen3) find reworded templates, shown under Organized campaigns, and cross-check the families; lexical, syntactic and stylometric features (TF-IDF, spaCy) score each comment’s originality for review. Neither decides a copy count. The full method is on the Methodologies page of roadless.org.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless